Projects
ProjectToken analysis Way of workOne owner, end to end Infrastructuremew, in Lark My workOn token efficiency ResultIn production Kabooopen source,inside ByteDance No relayraise it, solve it,test it, ship it mewagents built intothe dev process The problemtasks that succeedbut waste tokens Shippedtested anddeployed by me Token usewhere the tokensgo, and why Two safeguardsagent review first,rollback after In Larkthe path from ideato release, paved The fix5 waste criteria,Effective Tokens Reach10K+ internalusers How we work What I built
ByteDance · Internal Open Source · Token Efficiency · 10K+ DAU

Kaboo

An open-source token-analysis project inside ByteDance, built without hand-offs: I raised the problem, designed the Token Efficiency Leaderboard, tested it and shipped it myself.

Company
ByteDance
Project
Kaboo, internal open source
My part
Token Efficiency Leaderboard
Reach
10,000+ internal users

What it is

Kaboo is an open-source project inside ByteDance that analyzes token consumption.

The most interesting thing about it, though, isn't what it does but how it was made: with a new way of working together.

How we work

There's no relay of people here, no "file a requirement, schedule it, build it, test it, ship it." Whoever raises a problem designs the fix, runs the tests and deploys it to production themselves. Each person owns their part, end to end.

Quality rests on two safeguards:

  1. Before release, an agent checks the change for problems.
  2. After release, anything that goes wrong can be rolled back quickly.

Why it works

It works because the infrastructure is in place. We build on mew, a project-management platform that builds agents into the software-development process, and it is connected to Lark.

The road from idea to implementation is already paved. As long as you can say clearly what you want, you can build it and ship it yourself.

What I did

Working this way, I owned the Token Efficiency Leaderboard and the efficiency-analysis module.

I raised the problem. Everyone looked at where agents failed; nobody looked at tasks that succeeded but were wasteful along the way.

I designed the fix:

  • I defined criteria for five kinds of waste.
  • I designed a diagnosis that uses only metadata and never touches content.
  • I normalized cost across different models with Effective Tokens.

Then I tested it and shipped it myself. It now covers more than 10,000 internal users.

What I learned

This gave me a very concrete picture of how collaboration works in the AI era. Once the infrastructure flattens the cost of implementation, the bottleneck becomes whether you can think a problem through and say it clearly.

A person's value lies more in judgment than in execution.

Board

Drag to move · ⌘ / Ctrl + scroll or pinch to zoom · full screen for a closer look

Outcome

10K+
Internal users the leaderboard and the analysis now cover
5
Kinds of waste, each with a criterion for spotting it
Metadata only
The diagnosis never reads the content of a session